Who it's for · Buy-and-build
Every deal run the same way
When you are doing six a year rather than one every three years, the problem stops being finding a target and starts being consistency.
The problem at volume
The second deal is run by someone who was not on the first. The diligence list is a copy of a copy. The integration plan is whatever the last one was, minus the bits nobody remembered. Investors ask for a pipeline report and somebody spends a day building it.
- One list, one deal room structure, one integration plan on every deal
- A board across all mandates, and a per-mandate board for each deal lead
- Pipeline value that counts deals past first contact, not the whole long list
- The reason a firm was passed over, still there when it comes round again
Reporting that is already true
An owner view across every mandate, and a read-only portal per acquirer showing their own deals. Because the report is generated from the deals rather than assembled for a meeting, the number in it is the number in the system.
See it on your own buying brief
The most useful demo is against a real brief — what you are buying, where, and at what size. You will see your own long list, not a demo account.
Request a demo